simondelliott

What makes an online community tick

The relationship between content, technology and community

It does not matter which definition you use to describe Web2.0, they all agree with one thing, which is that it is being driven by the online community or social network. If you have never worked as a member of a virtual team then the collaborative and egalitarian nature of the Web2 tool set will seem like madness.

If you want to understand the lunacy then here is a list of things that will get you up to speed.

  • Organise an event [party/gig/exhibition] using facebook
  • Play an online game with someone you have never met
  • Organise your next personal project using base camp
  • Add to the definition of something that you are expert at, in the wikipedia.
  • Read a blog, and comment on it

Im now assuming that you have done all of the above.

As architects we may be asked to deliver solutions for these online comunities, and there is a vast amount of technology out there for you to enjoy and sometimes suffer.

Successful online communities grow and grow with little or no traditional marketing. When you first start an online community it seems to take you ages to get the technology and design how you want it to be whole lives can be lost making the perfect CSS to scale the as yet unmade content, we have all worked on projects where the teck has taken man years to get to the first release candidate.

When the big opening day finally comes and you launch your web servers out into the internet, and it falls flat. No one registers apart from the people who made it (and their mums). If you have done some marketing then you get a few views but after a few months that drops off and your community is a failure.

The content of your web site can be made up of manny manny, things, such as games, forums pages, papers, documents, movies, comments, … the list is endless. It is best to think of everything as just content. A piece of text is content in the same way that a “mapping favourites” feature is. The amount of and quality of this is called a websites weight.

In portal terms there are 4 types of people in the world.

  • The Unaware – people who have never been to your website
  • The Audience – people who have diped in to your website once or twice
  • The Members – people who have registered
  • The Commiters – these are people who make a contribution

The atoms of content that contribute to the weight of a website is created by it contributors, some of which you normally pay; people such as the developers and producers, some of which you dont normally pay; people such as the blogers and commentators.

A good piece of technology allows the community that uses your site to create good content, which attracts more contributors, which in-turn add to the content.

Sooner or later the community start needing more features or scale, which empowers the community to make good content which is passed on to others who then join the community … who need more features …
who make better content … and so on

This diagram shows how a successful community works. It is a relationship between content, technology and the community. If any part of this loop is weak then it lets down the others, which leads to a stagnant community. As architects we must decide on, design and describe the technology, but you must remember that we are only a third of the story.

It is important to understand this relationship before you start designing

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • Technorati

Copyright 2010 simondelliott | Theme Black Hole 1.0.2 by Karmadude

Powered by WordPress v3.0 | Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS).



Pages
  • posts
  • welcome
    • Architecture for the consumer
      • Show your architecture in a interesting way
      • Technology predictions and roadmap (to 2030)
    • Community Architecture
      • Sizing an online community (or how big is a web site)
      • What makes an online community tick
      • The contributors journey
      • Community Portal Environments
      • Portal logical architecture
    • Managing a media company
    • Television Architecture
      • CCTV is still television
      • Have your own TV channel
      • The headend and what it does for a cable network
    • Code
      • Randomise an array in javascript
Archives
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • September 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
Categories
  • architecture (31)
  • code (15)
  • colaboration (26)
  • data power (5)
  • desktop (2)
  • development (1)
  • down turn (1)
  • drawings (1)
  • enterprise (11)
  • government (7)
  • green (1)
  • ideas (17)
  • management (3)
  • marketing (19)
  • media (11)
  • news (9)
  • Opensource (1)
  • random (6)
  • retail (4)
  • television (5)
  • Uncategorized (44)
  • web2.0 (18)
Blogroll
  • a good read from a friend of mine
  • A great architect
  • communication skills
  • Craig – Good UK web consultant
  • del.ico.us feed
  • Fantasy Movie Makers
  • Ian Nock – architect and good TV guy
  • Miss Geeky media blogger
  • My delicious feed
  • old blog
  • Project Euler
Meta
  • Register
  • Log in
  • Valid XHTML
  • XFN
  • WordPress